Book Review: We Were Liars

We Were LiarsWe Were Liars by E. Lockhart
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

You’ll either love this story, or hate it. Love the writing style, or despise it. I guarantee you this : this book will take you to your extremities. So you’ll need to buckle up.

Needless to say (you can see my rating after all)… I ADORED this book.

Guess the fact that this is the first book review I’ve written in over a year adds substance to the above statement.

We were liars is… a broken story about a broken girl narrated with broken cadence. And like a sly wink from the author, Cadence is our protagonist with the broken memories and a life torn apart.

Cadence, her two cousins Johnny and Mirren, and their Indian American friend Gat are the Liars, and theirs is a bond that began in Summer Eight (they all are the same age). Every summer, the entire Sinclair family convenes in their family island, and the Liars are reunited. But something went wrong in Summer Fifteen.

Something that Cadence is trying to recall.

But memory can be a bitch.

I’m not going to be spoilerish, and I’m not going to ‘Lie’ as the blurb asks me to. In fact, a piece of advice forget about the blurb and the lies. Delve into a brilliantly imaginative but broken mind. And you’ll find that the narration is such a pleasure.

Whimsical.
Satirical.
Cruel, even.

It dragged me in, and when I resurfaced in the end, I was crying and grinning at the same time.

We Were Liars deserves a five and a resounding applause. E. Lockhart, you brought me back into the reading world. Thank you!

View all my reviews

Advertisements

Book Review: The Fine Art of Truth or Dare


The Fine Art of Truth or Dare by Melissa Jensen

My rating: 1 of 5 stars

Date of finishing: 23rd Jan 2013
Recommended for: NO ONE.

The Fine Art of Truth or Dare

Truth: I found the title very interesting.
Truth: I thought the cover picture was adorable.
Truth: I shouldn’t have read this one. Really.

There is this thing about expectations – when something falls short, it really breaks your heart. This book came very close to breaking my heart – good thing I stop expecting things halfway!

The story started off beautifully. First when Edward Willing was mentioned, I first balked… After all, Twilight has jinxed the name for me and I began thinking why any author would take the risk of naming their protagonist so… And then came this part and I loved it:

Truth: Edward Willing died in 1916.

Na, that doesn’t make me morbid – it just made me think that this story might just get interesting. Especially with all those potentially humorous situations of a Willing Girl.
WRONG.

The hero is Alex-who-is-not-Alexander-but-Alexei. The heroine is scarred (literally and figuratively) and suffers from major complex. And they have no story. This story could have been about growth. This story could have featured the girl taking up a Dare when it actually mattered. This story could have had haunted artists and haunting artists (or that may be just wishful thinking). It unfortunately has none of those.

I have no idea what Alex has to recommend for himself. And the sad thing is that even Ella herself couldn’t answer that one. All we know about him is that he is hot, and 6 ft tall. Is that even a description? I have no idea how he looks like. At least we have some visual cues about Ella – long hair, timid and invisible personality so I figure I’d never really see her face if I ever even tried to imagine her. I just don’t feel like doing that – she’s a huge waste of time. I like the best friends, though, who never really got their own space in this half baked story. I’d like to know what actually went behind Sadie’s voluminous clothes, if Frankie really bounced back every time he failed in love. And ironically, the person I like the best is the scarcely mentioned Daniel, the Frankie’s-twin-gangster-dude.

The only thing realistic about the story was Ella’s family. It was loud, loving and bossy just like every closely knitted family and it was the only thing that kept me going in this story. Because frankly speaking the story really didn’t end up anywhere. Why wasn’t there any plot, dammit?!

What happened about Anna! Why didn’t Sienna’s fiancé/husband get a scene? Why wasn’t Alex given a life, dammit? Why was he the hero? Till the last moment I was hoping the author would change her mind and give Daniel the spotlight, unexpectedly making him the hero! And the most important question – why did Ella exist at all? Because I believe every story comes up for a reason – for the love of a character, for the passion for some plot, or for vengeance or justice. I found no story at all in this one – just dry make-belief conversations.

I suggest you do not read this. Please.

I really do hate negative reviews :/

View all my reviews

 

Book Review: Parallel Visions

Parallel Visions (A Teen Psychic Novel, #1)Parallel Visions by Cheryl Rainfield

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This one felt too short to be called a novel – honestly speaking it would be a novella. But its sweetness makes up for the length.

What would you risk to save your loved one’s life? If the way you could prevent disasters was to send yourself to the face of danger, would you do it? And if you could see visions… does that mean there’s something wrong with you?

The story is meant for a younger audience – early teens probably – and the writing shows. It might have irritated me had not the writing really worked for the story line.

Verdict: 3.5 stars, short and sweet

*Book provided for honest review by NetGalley*

View all my reviews

Book Review: Gone With The Wind

Gone With The Wind cover image

Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

After a long, long time I had a marathon-reading-session like this and I never enjoyed this much. After 14 hours of chasing Scarlett O’Hara’s escapades in Gone With The Wind, my heart is still thundering, and I’m still mournfully and gravely shaking my wise old head over the stubborn-est couple I ever met in print.

I’m a big Historical Romance fan and I realized that Gone With The Wind was the mother of all HR’s I’ve read till now, and I don’t refer to its length. The details, the plot, the writing, the stating of the bald truth – it’s incomparable. At the hands of any other writer, I would have disliked Scarlett and would probably have stopped reading. But now, after finding her self-centered and vain, childish, cruel, delusional, and then morph into strong, determined and as modern as one could be in the 1860-70s and then pitying her for never really opening her eyes, I now wonder at Margaret Mitchell’s ability to wrench such intense reactions.

Sometimes Frank sighed, thinking he had caught a tropic bird, all flame and jewel color, when a wren would have served him just as well. In fact, much better.

~ Excerpt from Gone With The Wind

Scarlett was exactly what Mitchell claims – an inexplicable woman, an exotic bird, who was a deadly combination of stubborn childishness and a passionate ruthlessness of a woman who has known her lowest. It was that combination that dragged her out of hell; it was that combination that doomed her love life. She was inherently selfish, but she loved and hated with passion. The stubborn, selfish child refused to distinguish between love and fantasy, while the ruthlessness led her to hide her emotions, driving the nail on her coffin as the universally declared heartless womanMitchell had given us a premonition that this was going to happen to Scarlett:

“Child, it’s a very bad thing for a woman to face the worst that can happen to her, because after she’s faced the worst she can’t ever really fear anything again. And it’s very bad for a woman not to be afraid of something.(…) God intended women to be timid frightened creatures and there’s something unnatural about a woman who isn’t afraid… Scarlett, always save something to fear—even as you save something to love… ”

~ Excerpt from Gone With The Wind

A Scarlett who had faced her worst became a fanatic about making money and securing her future, and that very fearlessness that she had been warned about let her achieve what she wanted, or thought she wanted. She gained universal contempt and dislike for working and going beyond the boundary lines of feminity. She was hated because she succeeded in those endeavors. Her contemporaries failed to understand her like she failed to understand them, and they viewed her ruthlessness with as much contempt as she viewed their wounded pride.

While she succeeded in her business, Scarlett hardly made any breakthroughs in personal relationships. Scarlett was ruthless and cunning yes, but she lacked in the cranial department. Or maybe that can partly be attributed to self-absorption. She didn’t understand a lot of things, and just didn’t care. She didn’t understand herself, she didn’t understand Melanie, she didn’t understand Ashley, she didn’t understand Rhett. However that didn’t stop her from blindly judge people and everyone other than her imagined love fell short of her regard. And some regard it was, with her manipulating him like she did everyone else. She refused to see, preferring to make money to secure her safety. But cash is a cold bed partner, and so Scarlett discovered.

She was a person who was never universally loved; as a young woman she was the country belle and the object of envy for the other debutantes; she was always too beautiful and unconventional thus generating censure; her business venture followed by her marriage to Rhett Butler permanently damned her. But she had never courted public opinion and had never cared, until a tragedy ripped her life away. Or rather, three tragedies that fell one after one. Bonnie’s death, Melanie’s death, death of Rhett’s love. And understanding, as much as Scarlett could be capable of, came too late.

Everybody knew how cold and heartless she was. Everybody was appalled at the seeming ease with which she had recovered from Bonnie’s death, never realizing or caring to realize the effort that lay behind that seeming recovery. Rhett had the town’s tenderest sympathy and he neither knew nor cared. Scarlett had the town’s dislike and, for once, she would have welcomed the sympathy of old friends.

~Excerpt from Gone With The Wind

She was a dynamic woman – her character growing and evolving from vain and pretty to a strong woman, but I wish she had more foresight, or more intelligence. For al her character growth, maybe it wasn’t enough. Or maybe it wasn’t fast enough…

Gone With The Wind narrates two different kinds of strong feminity – Scarlett’s loud one and Melanie’s quiet one. Melanie was a woman who was sheltered, but who refused to balk at the prospect of hard work. She never was loud, but she defended what she believed in. She never courted good favour; she had an innate goodness that looked for the best in others. I’ll let Mitchell describe her:

(…) she always saw the best in everyone and remarked kindly upon it. There was no servant so stupid that she did not find some redeeming trait of loyalty and kind-heartedness, no girl so ugly and disagreeable that she could not discover grace of form or nobility of character in her, and no man so worthless or so boring that she did not view him in the light of his possibilities rather than his actualities. Because of these qualities that came sincerely and spontaneously from a generous heart, everyone flocked about her, for who can resist the charm of one who discovers in others admirable qualities undreamed of even by himself?

~Excerpt from Gone With The Wind

When Reconstruction led to further upheavals in Atlanta, Melanie became a leader without wanting to, without realizing how it happened. It’s even probable that she never did realized exactly how much she meant to the community.

It’s a curious thing, Harry, but perhaps those who are best suited to power are those who have never sought it.

~Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

Maybe it can be measured by the fact that her goodwill outweighed the town’s contempt of Scarlett. The two sisters-in-laws who were strong enough to elicit strong reactions out of people. Melanie might seem slightly naïve, but her genuinity evokes respect, not pity.

Ashley, however, evoked little more than impatience and anger from me. I won’t ask what Scarlett saw in him because it’s perfectly clear: she saw what she wanted to see. Her painted hero was simple in her brain, but the two male protagonists were complex men. Ashley loved his books but knew duty and honour. But I couldn’t respect him much because he didn’t stand by his convictions, not like the other three protagonists. He didn’t realize he had loved Melanie all along till she was in her death bed, and I maintain that Melanie deserved much better. Ashley’s indecisiveness killed the love between two couples – Rhett and Scarlett, Melanie and himself.

Rhett Butler broke my heart. He was another victim of Scarlett, and like all others, broken in the end. He was the swash-buckling pirate, the exciting bad man in a town of gallant gentlemen who like all others, fell in love, and then had his heart broken. He saw right through Scarlett, and still loved her and I respect him highly for that. He loved a woman who loved (or thought she loved) another. I still can’t understand what it was in Scarlett that made him wait for her for thirteen years. How does unrequited love last that long?

But, Scarlett, did it ever occur to you that even the most deathless love could wear out?

That line broke my heart and I cried for these two stubborn people. At first I felt bewildered – I chase this whirlwind of a story for fourteen wild hours and the ending is heading toward a tragedy. And as I encountered this sentence I tried scrolling down to realize I couldn’t:

“I’ll think of it all tomorrow, at Tara. I can stand it then. Tomorrow, I’ll think of some way to get him back. After all, tomorrow is another day.”

I felt totally betrayed when I finally realized that the book had indeed come to an end and it wasn’t just that my copy was incomplete or corrupted. I immediately went online to check if there were sequels. There are, but not by the original author. Cheated and betrayed, I find that hope springs eternal. Because I can still look forward to a better future for the stubborn, headstrong Butlers. They are mind-boggling, they are refreshing. And they have left me sated… and hungry for more.

 

View all my reviews